View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
LegionOfHell Apprentice

Joined: 16 Mar 2019 Posts: 253 Location: Toronto, Canada
|
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2020 2:04 am Post subject: Recommend a good web browser with low compile time ? |
|
|
I am installing qutebrowser atm and it is taking forever on an i7-7700HQ with -j8 particularly the qtwebengine+pyqt5...
How does firefox-bin compare to qutebrowser ? how long does it take for you to compile firefox-bin ?
Do you recommend the Tor browser ? since it comes bundled with all the binaries/libraries ?
many thanks |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dmpogo Advocate

Joined: 02 Sep 2004 Posts: 2969 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2020 3:49 am Post subject: Re: Recommend a good web browser with low compile time ? |
|
|
LegionOfHell wrote: | I am installing qutebrowser atm and it is taking forever on an i7-7700HQ with -j8 particularly the qtwebengine+pyqt5...
How does firefox-bin compare to qutebrowser ? how long does it take for you to compile firefox-bin ?
Do you recommend the Tor browser ? since it comes bundled with all the binaries/libraries ?
many thanks |
I have switched to vivaldi |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
LegionOfHell Apprentice

Joined: 16 Mar 2019 Posts: 253 Location: Toronto, Canada
|
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2020 4:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
what renderer does vivaldi use ? I expect it to be as bad as the other ones(chromium/firefox/qute...) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
fedeliallalinea Bodhisattva


Joined: 08 Mar 2003 Posts: 25178 Location: here
|
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2020 5:56 am Post subject: Re: Recommend a good web browser with low compile time ? |
|
|
LegionOfHell wrote: | How does firefox-bin compare to qutebrowser ? how long does it take for you to compile firefox-bin ? |
Only the download time, firefox-bin is binary and download official build from mozilla site. _________________ Questions are guaranteed in life; Answers aren't. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Juippisi Developer


Joined: 30 Sep 2005 Posts: 510 Location: /home
|
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2020 7:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
I find firefox to be bearable in compile times. Just for reference, qtwebengine takes 40 minutes and firefox takes 10 minutes here (without pgo).
Sure there are binary alternatives, firefox-bin, google-chrome, vivaldi... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
fedeliallalinea Bodhisattva


Joined: 08 Mar 2003 Posts: 25178 Location: here
|
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2020 7:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Juippisi wrote: | I find firefox to be bearable in compile times. Just for reference, qtwebengine takes 40 minutes and firefox takes 10 minutes here (without pgo). |
That is true but you should add also rust/clang/llvm compilation time for firefox. _________________ Questions are guaranteed in life; Answers aren't. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ant P. Watchman

Joined: 18 Apr 2009 Posts: 6881
|
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2020 8:33 am Post subject: Re: Recommend a good web browser with low compile time ? |
|
|
LegionOfHell wrote: | How does firefox-bin compare to qutebrowser ? how long does it take for you to compile firefox-bin ? |
Code: | ~ # qlop -mc firefox-bin
www-client/firefox-bin: 2′07″ average for 33 merges
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sdauth Apprentice


Joined: 19 Sep 2018 Posts: 221 Location: Ásgarðr
|
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2020 9:29 am Post subject: Re: Recommend a good web browser with low compile time ? |
|
|
LegionOfHell wrote: | I am installing qutebrowser atm and it is taking forever on an i7-7700HQ with -j8 particularly the qtwebengine+pyqt5...
How does firefox-bin compare to qutebrowser ? how long does it take for you to compile firefox-bin ?
Do you recommend the Tor browser ? since it comes bundled with all the binaries/libraries ?
many thanks |
Try palemoon, it compiles fast and does not depend on stuff coming straight from hell like rust, nodejs, qtwebengine etc.. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
C5ace Guru

Joined: 23 Dec 2013 Posts: 370 Location: Brisbane, Australia
|
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2020 10:29 am Post subject: Re: Recommend a good web browser with low compile time ? |
|
|
LegionOfHell wrote: | I am installing qutebrowser atm and it is taking forever on an i7-7700HQ with -j8 particularly the qtwebengine+pyqt5...
How does firefox-bin compare to qutebrowser ? how long does it take for you to compile firefox-bin ?
Do you recommend the Tor browser ? since it comes bundled with all the binaries/libraries ?
many thanks |
Try www-client/netsurf. Basic, very fast. Extremely fast compile time. _________________ Observation after 30 years working with computers:
All software has known and unknown bugs and vulnerabilities. Especially software written in complex, unstable and object oriented languages such as python, perl, C++, C#, Rust and the likes. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sdauth Apprentice


Joined: 19 Sep 2018 Posts: 221 Location: Ásgarðr
|
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2020 3:09 pm Post subject: Re: Recommend a good web browser with low compile time ? |
|
|
C5ace wrote: | LegionOfHell wrote: | I am installing qutebrowser atm and it is taking forever on an i7-7700HQ with -j8 particularly the qtwebengine+pyqt5...
How does firefox-bin compare to qutebrowser ? how long does it take for you to compile firefox-bin ?
Do you recommend the Tor browser ? since it comes bundled with all the binaries/libraries ?
many thanks |
Try www-client/netsurf. Basic, very fast. Extremely fast compile time. |
This one is really nice indeed. It has been updated recently as well. (3.10) I hope a new ebuild will be available soon!
Code: | NetSurf 3.10 features many fixes, better performance and improved functionality. In particular, handling of authentication, certificates and fetch errors have been updated and unified. The GTK front end has had a major overhaul too. We recommend all users upgrade to NetSurf 3.10. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
LegionOfHell Apprentice

Joined: 16 Mar 2019 Posts: 253 Location: Toronto, Canada
|
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2020 3:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Juippisi wrote: | I find firefox to be bearable in compile times. Just for reference, qtwebengine takes 40 minutes and firefox takes 10 minutes here (without pgo).
Sure there are binary alternatives, firefox-bin, google-chrome, vivaldi... |
wow that is fast...what is your cpu and ram ?
qtwebengine took 2.5 hours here... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dmpogo Advocate

Joined: 02 Sep 2004 Posts: 2969 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sat Jun 20, 2020 3:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
LegionOfHell wrote: | what renderer does vivaldi use ? I expect it to be as bad as the other ones(chromium/firefox/qute...) |
It is chromium, but it is distributed as a binary. I gave up for now on compiling browsers (though stil have qtwebengine/falkon combination install, where it does not require update). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
apiaio Apprentice

Joined: 04 Dec 2008 Posts: 268
|
Posted: Sat Jun 20, 2020 5:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Slightly off topic.
Talking about browsers. Which one would you recommend for developing and testing web applications (xhtml, php, mysql, js + jquery)?
I'm using firefox, konqueror and opera. Are there in portage any others with good debugging tools? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dmpogo Advocate

Joined: 02 Sep 2004 Posts: 2969 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sat Jun 20, 2020 8:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
apiaio wrote: | Slightly off topic.
Talking about browsers. Which one would you recommend for developing and testing web applications (xhtml, php, mysql, js + jquery)?
I'm using firefox, konqueror and opera. Are there in portage any others with good debugging tools? |
I have no idea but my guess would be that you want to test on platforms most used by users ? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Makersmarx n00b


Joined: 16 Feb 2019 Posts: 51 Location: Costa Rica
|
Posted: Sat Jun 20, 2020 9:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
apiaio wrote: | Slightly off topic.
Talking about browsers. Which one would you recommend for developing and testing web applications (xhtml, php, mysql, js + jquery)?
I'm using firefox, konqueror and opera. Are there in portage any others with good debugging tools? |
Really you have it covered, I prefer FF as much as possible, but jump into Chrome or some chrome based browser as needed. _________________ Pura Vida |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|