View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
necktwi Apprentice

Joined: 24 Aug 2018 Posts: 156
|
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2019 4:21 am Post subject: emerge pam-1.3.1-r1 fails |
|
|
emerge pam fails with
Code: | make[3]: *** No rule to make target 'access.conf.5', needed by 'all-am'. |
RPi1B2:~ Necktwi$ sudo emerge --info '=sys-libs/pam-1.3.1-r1::gentoo' | wgetpaste -u
http://tinyurl.com/yb6g7889
RPi1B2:~ Necktwi$ sudo emerge -pqv '=sys-libs/pam-1.3.1-r1::gentoo' | wgetpaste -u
http://tinyurl.com/y729fx8o
RPi1B2:~ Necktwi$ wgetpaste -u /tmp/portage/sys-libs/pam-1.3.1-r1/temp/build.log
http://tinyurl.com/y77qe7v5
RPi1B2:~ Necktwi$ wgetpaste -u /tmp/portage/sys-libs/pam-1.3.1-r1/temp/environment
http://tinyurl.com/y9ta6524
Thanq! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mike155 Advocate

Joined: 17 Sep 2010 Posts: 2564 Location: Frankfurt, Germany
|
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2019 8:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think you should open a bug in Gentoo's bugzilla.
pam-1.3.1.tar.gz does NOT contain a file 'access.conf.5'. But it contains a file 'access.conf.5.xml'.
If I emerge pam-1.3.1 on my machine (amd64), the statement below is executed to create 'access.conf.5' from 'access.conf.5.xml':
Code: | /usr/bin/xsltproc
-o /var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/pam-1.3.1-r1/work/linux-pam-1.3.1/modules/pam_access/access.conf.5
--path /var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/pam-1.3.1-r1/work/linux-pam-1.3.1/modules/pam_access
--xinclude --nonet http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/current/manpages/docbook.xsl
/var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/pam-1.3.1-r1/work/linux-pam-1.3.1/modules/pam_access/access.conf.5.xml
|
I don't see that xsltproc statement in your build.log.
Since the xsltproc command didn't run on your machine, 'access.conf.5' wasn't created. Make finally detected the missing file and aborted with the error message you posted. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Hu Moderator

Joined: 06 Mar 2007 Posts: 16472
|
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2019 10:33 pm Post subject: Re: emerge pam-1.3.1-r1 fails |
|
|
Please stop using URL shorteners. I unshortened the last batch you posted because there is no need to do it on the forum. We don't retype the inputs, and you can copy the full URLs from your shell. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
necktwi Apprentice

Joined: 24 Aug 2018 Posts: 156
|
Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 2:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hu, I am not shortening the URL on purpose, its the output of wgetpaste -u. Without -u option, wgetpaste is printing unnecessary text: "Your paste can be seen here: ". It's especially lengthy when posting in IRC channels. I can't make two wgetpastes for each IRC and forums.
Why would someone don't want to open shortened URL when they knew its given out by wgetpaste?
BTW, I can't find many of my previous posts in "View your posts". Any data loss occurred? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Muso Veteran


Joined: 22 Oct 2002 Posts: 1054 Location: The Holy city of Honolulu
|
Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 3:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
necktwi wrote: | BTW, I can't find many of my previous posts in "View your posts". Any data loss occurred? |
I see a bunch : https://forums.gentoo.org/search.php?search_author=necktwi _________________ "You can lead a horticulture but you can't make her think" ~ Dorothy Parker
2021 is the year of the Linux Desktop! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
necktwi Apprentice

Joined: 24 Aug 2018 Posts: 156
|
Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 12:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
that bunch isn't all! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Hu Moderator

Joined: 06 Mar 2007 Posts: 16472
|
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2019 2:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
necktwi wrote: | Hu, I am not shortening the URL on purpose, its the output of wgetpaste -u. | According to the documentation, passing -u tells wgetpaste to shorten the URL, so yes, you are purposely shortening the URLs. necktwi wrote: | Without -u option, wgetpaste is printing unnecessary text: "Your paste can be seen here: ". It's especially lengthy when posting in IRC channels. I can't make two wgetpastes for each IRC and forums. | So use the same long one on both. The long URLs aren't that long, and there are probably IRC users who avoid shortened URLs too. In my opinion, the only reason to ever use a shortened URL is when you need to pass it through a medium that cannot tolerate a long URL: reading it to someone verbally, typing it on a smartphone, or possibly when trying to post it to Twitter. necktwi wrote: | Why would someone don't want to open shortened URL when they knew its given out by wgetpaste? | How do they know that? They know that it's a string from you. They are asked to take on faith that it is from wgetpaste and points to a pastebin. It could as easily point to NSFW content (which is also Not-Safe-For-Young-Children, but NSFYC isn't a commonly recognized category). I always treat blind URLs as if they could redirect to something inappropriate, meaning I cannot safely open them unless I have complete privacy. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
necktwi Apprentice

Joined: 24 Aug 2018 Posts: 156
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
suprafluid n00b

Joined: 07 Jan 2011 Posts: 39 Location: Deep in the Bavarian Forrest, Germany
|
Posted: Wed Jan 29, 2020 1:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's about one year after this thread has been created.
I now ran into the same issue "No rule to make target 'access.conf.5', needed by 'all-am'." when emerging pam-1.3.1-r1.
Any ideas how to fix this? _________________ Running GENTOO since 2004 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|