Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
GNOME Without Systemd
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 21, 22, 23  
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Unsupported Software
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
dantrell
Guru
Guru


Joined: 01 Jun 2007
Posts: 332
Location: Earth

PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 1:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Juippisi wrote:
Yep, it works again :)

Thanks for confirming.

Juippisi wrote:
Gonna read the bug next.

It seemed pretty straightforward. Either I implemented it incorrectly or the solution doesn't actually work.

I'm probably going to table this until GNOME 3.28 or something. :P
_________________
Dantrell B.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
simonvanderveldt
n00b
n00b


Joined: 26 Jan 2016
Posts: 74

PostPosted: Thu Jan 25, 2018 8:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

dantrell wrote:
simonvanderveldt wrote:
After that I upgraded my second machine to 3.26 and it's having the same issue as my other one in that I can only login using GDM if I login using the console first. At least I can reproduce the issue now :)

Could it be related to the elogind version? Maybe try the stable one:

Code:
emerge --ask --oneshot =sys-auth/elogind-227.4


I tried both elogind 229.9 as well as 227.4 (which was actually blocked by one of the 3.26 packages), but unfortunately nothing changed.

There's no way to use/try out ConsoleKit instead of elogind with 3.26, right?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dantrell
Guru
Guru


Joined: 01 Jun 2007
Posts: 332
Location: Earth

PostPosted: Fri Jan 26, 2018 1:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

simonvanderveldt wrote:
There's no way to use/try out ConsoleKit instead of elogind with 3.26, right?

Not at the moment but the restructuring makes adding support for ConsoleKit even more trivial.

I just have to make time for it. Think it's needed?
_________________
Dantrell B.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
simonvanderveldt
n00b
n00b


Joined: 26 Jan 2016
Posts: 74

PostPosted: Fri Jan 26, 2018 6:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

dantrell wrote:
simonvanderveldt wrote:
There's no way to use/try out ConsoleKit instead of elogind with 3.26, right?

Not at the moment but the restructuring makes adding support for ConsoleKit even more trivial.

I just have to make time for it. Think it's needed?


Unless someone else has a reason to need ConsoleKit instead of elogind I'd say no, it isn't needed.
It should work with elogind and elogind is the way forward anyway.
I'll keep digging till I find out what's causing it :)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
steveL
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 13 Sep 2006
Posts: 4849
Location: The Peanut Gallery

PostPosted: Fri Feb 02, 2018 5:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

simonvanderveldt wrote:
There's no way to use/try out ConsoleKit instead of elogind with 3.26, right?

dantrell wrote:
Not at the moment but the restructuring makes adding support for ConsoleKit even more trivial.

I just have to make time for it. Think it's needed?
If it is really trivial, then I'd suggest it would be useful as a legacy implementation, both for situations like Simon's, to test against elogind on an end-user's machine and see what varies; and as a way forward for any other distros that might like to use your work.

After all, it is from-source.

Only if it's easy, and your head is already in that code-space, ofc.
I think it'd be useful for elogind as well (feedback on variance with the expected legacy ABI.)

Just a thought; keep up the sterling effort. :-)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Marlo
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 26 Jul 2003
Posts: 1274

PostPosted: Mon Feb 05, 2018 5:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gnome 3.26

Hello dantrell,
Is that art or can it away?

Code:
@tux ~ $ dmesg | grep udev
[    3.827143] udevd[635]: starting version 3.2.5
[    3.848591] udevd[635]: RUN{builtin}: 'uaccess' unknown /lib64/udev/rules.d/73-seat-late.rules:15
[    3.861940] udevd[636]: starting eudev-3.2.5
[    3.915468] udevd[636]: RUN{builtin}: 'uaccess' unknown /lib64/udev/rules.d/73-seat-late.rules:15

$ cat /lib64/udev/rules.d/73-seat-late.rules:

#  This file is part of systemd.
#
#  systemd is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
#  under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public License as published by
#  the Free Software Foundation; either version 2.1 of the License, or
#  (at your option) any later version.

ACTION=="remove", GOTO="seat_late_end"

ENV{ID_SEAT}=="", ENV{ID_AUTOSEAT}=="1", ENV{ID_FOR_SEAT}!="", ENV{ID_SEAT}="seat-$env{ID_FOR_SEAT}"
ENV{ID_SEAT}=="", IMPORT{parent}="ID_SEAT"

ENV{ID_SEAT}!="", TAG+="$env{ID_SEAT}"

TAG=="uaccess", ENV{MAJOR}!="", RUN{builtin}+="uaccess"

LABEL="seat_late_end"


Where can this come from?
Is it safe to delete this?

Thanks in advance
Ma

[Moderator edit: changed latter [quote] tags to [code] tags to preserve output layout. -Hu]
_________________
Thks 4 ur attention, interest & support.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Shibotto
n00b
n00b


Joined: 19 Jun 2015
Posts: 46
Location: Italy

PostPosted: Tue Feb 06, 2018 4:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Using GNOME 3.26 and I just found out Contacts search provider for the Shell doesn't work out of the box. I don't know when it broke, maybe 3.26.1? Anyway, simple steps to (temporarily) fix it:

  1. Create /usr/share/gnome-shell/search-providers/org.gnome.Contacts.search-provider.ini (source)
    Code:
    [Shell Search Provider]
    DesktopId=org.gnome.Contacts.desktop
    BusName=org.gnome.Contacts.SearchProvider
    ObjectPath=/org/gnome/Contacts/SearchProvider
    Version=2

  2. Adjust gnome-contacts-search-provider path in /usr/share/dbus-1/services/org.gnome.Contacts.SearchProvider.service
    Code:
    [D-BUS Service]
    Name=org.gnome.Contacts.SearchProvider
    Exec=/usr/bin/gnome-contacts-search-provider

  3. If needed, enable Contacts search provider in GNOME Settings
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dantrell
Guru
Guru


Joined: 01 Jun 2007
Posts: 332
Location: Earth

PostPosted: Wed Feb 07, 2018 4:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

steveL wrote:
Only if it's easy, and your head is already in that code-space, ofc.
I think it'd be useful for elogind as well (feedback on variance with the expected legacy ABI.)

This is probably something I'm going to end up doing.

steveL wrote:
Just a thought; keep up the sterling effort. :-)

Thanks for the continued support. :wink:

Marlo wrote:
Is that art or can it away?

I'm not sure where that file came from.

Marlo wrote:
Where can this come from?
Is it safe to delete this?

Find out with:

Code:
equery belongs /lib64/udev/rules.d/73-seat-late.rules

then decide.

Shibotto wrote:
Using GNOME 3.26 and I just found out Contacts search provider for the Shell doesn't work out of the box. I don't know when it broke, maybe 3.26.1

Thanks for the feedback.

GNOME Contacts 3.26 was the previous version. Do you recall that one working because I'm looking at the commit history and it's really just translation updates since then?
_________________
Dantrell B.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Shibotto
n00b
n00b


Joined: 19 Jun 2015
Posts: 46
Location: Italy

PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2018 5:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

dantrell wrote:
Shibotto wrote:
Using GNOME 3.26 and I just found out Contacts search provider for the Shell doesn't work out of the box. I don't know when it broke, maybe 3.26.1

Thanks for the feedback.

GNOME Contacts 3.26 was the previous version. Do you recall that one working because I'm looking at the commit history and it's really just translation updates since then?


Yeah, you are right. It seemed so strange to me that in 4 months I never noticed :\
Anyway I tried and 3.26 as expected is affected too, while 3.22.1 works as it is supposed to. So yeah, meson again? :D
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dantrell
Guru
Guru


Joined: 01 Jun 2007
Posts: 332
Location: Earth

PostPosted: Sat Feb 10, 2018 4:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Shibotto wrote:
So yeah, meson again? :D

As it turns out it was Meson. :twisted:

Sync up and you should be good to go.
_________________
Dantrell B.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gsora
n00b
n00b


Joined: 13 Sep 2016
Posts: 5

PostPosted: Sat Feb 10, 2018 2:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't know if this was already reported, but I had troubles building GNOME 3.24 extended.

telepathy-mission-control was missing UPower ldflags, I had to manually emerge UPower and then I was able to continue building gnome-base/gnome.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dantrell
Guru
Guru


Joined: 01 Jun 2007
Posts: 332
Location: Earth

PostPosted: Sat Feb 10, 2018 8:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

gsora wrote:
telepathy-mission-control was missing UPower ldflags, I had to manually emerge UPower and then I was able to continue building gnome-base/gnome.

Thanks for the feedback.

I was able to reproduce and correct this issue.
_________________
Dantrell B.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gsora
n00b
n00b


Joined: 13 Sep 2016
Posts: 5

PostPosted: Mon Feb 12, 2018 7:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Is the 3.26 overlay stable enough?

Right now I'm on 3.24 but I'm thinking about switching to .26 just for the translucent top bar :P
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dantrell
Guru
Guru


Joined: 01 Jun 2007
Posts: 332
Location: Earth

PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 5:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

gsora wrote:
Is the 3.26 overlay stable enough?

If it's available then at least 99% of it builds and runs so, yes, I would say it's stable enough.

Happy testing. :twisted:
_________________
Dantrell B.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gsora
n00b
n00b


Joined: 13 Sep 2016
Posts: 5

PostPosted: Sun Feb 18, 2018 1:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

dantrell wrote:
gsora wrote:
Is the 3.26 overlay stable enough?

If it's available then at least 99% of it builds and runs so, yes, I would say it's stable enough.

Happy testing. :twisted:


Confirmed, successfully updated from 3.24 to 3.26!

I just had to change profile, run
Code:
emerge --deep --with-bdeps=y --changed-use --update --ask --verbose @world
and let it crunch compiling for 40 minutes.

Does version 3.25.4 differs much from 3.26?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dantrell
Guru
Guru


Joined: 01 Jun 2007
Posts: 332
Location: Earth

PostPosted: Sun Feb 18, 2018 7:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

gsora wrote:
Confirmed, successfully updated from 3.24 to 3.26!

Glad to hear it. :)

gsora wrote:
Does version 3.25.4 differs much from 3.26?

Given a GNOME package version number of X.Y.Z:

1. If Y is odd, it's a pre-release and Z can be considered a "patch".
2. If Y is even and Z is 0, it's alpha.
2. If Y is even and Z is 1, it's beta.
2. If Y is even and Z is 2, it's "stable".

In this instance, 3.26 is probably just 3.25.4 with less issues.
_________________
Dantrell B.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Unsupported Software All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 21, 22, 23
Page 23 of 23

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum